Dittmar, Daniel wrote:
In the end, I think it's more efficient to implement such
a function in an abstraction layer which is maintained
independently from the DB-API database modules. Otherwise,
you'd have to wait for all modules to implement the change
and that can take a few years.
Perhaps the a
>In the end, I think it's more efficient to implement such
>a function in an abstraction layer which is maintained
>independently from the DB-API database modules. Otherwise,
>you'd have to wait for all modules to implement the change
>and that can take a few years.
Perhaps the abstraction layer s
Ian Bicking wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> What we could add an optional keyword argument uri="..." which
>> database could then interpret according to your suggestion.
>
>
> I suppose that would be fine -- I thought it would be easier to
> implement it on top of connect instead of as an ext
