Re: [DB-SIG] Extending DB-API

2006-11-16 Thread Ian Bicking
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> The major things I think we can standardize: >> >> * There's no common way to configure databases. I'd like to see a >> single URI syntax that everyone can use. This should be modestly >> extensible via query string parameters. > > There has been some discussion about t

Re: [DB-SIG] Extending DB-API

2006-11-16 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Ian Bicking wrote: > I probably won't have the time to really follow this through, but since > there has been a little discussion of this stuff lately I'd like to > throw out an idea for where I think Python database standards should go. > This mostly builds on the dbapi rather than extending

[DB-SIG] (no subject)

2006-11-16 Thread Jan Ekström
___ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig

Re: [DB-SIG] SQL DDL

2006-11-16 Thread Art Protin
Dear folks, Carsten Haese wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:18 -0500, Art Protin wrote: Dear folks, In earlier messages, I noted that the Specification (v2.0) does not adequately express that the "operation" argument is SQL (although the coverage of the API in "PYHON in a Nutshell is

[DB-SIG] Extending DB-API

2006-11-16 Thread Ian Bicking
I probably won't have the time to really follow this through, but since there has been a little discussion of this stuff lately I'd like to throw out an idea for where I think Python database standards should go. This mostly builds on the dbapi rather than extending it directly (I think). Th

Re: [DB-SIG] SQL DDL

2006-11-16 Thread Carsten Haese
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:18 -0500, Art Protin wrote: > Dear folks, > In earlier messages, I noted that the Specification (v2.0) does > not adequately express that the "operation" argument is SQL (although > the coverage of the API in "PYHON in a Nutshell is hardly ambiguous at > all). Now

Re: [DB-SIG] SQL DDL

2006-11-16 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Art Protin wrote: > Dear folks, > In earlier messages, I noted that the Specification (v2.0) does > not adequately express that the "operation" argument is SQL (although > the coverage of the API in "PYHON in a Nutshell is hardly ambiguous at > all). Now I am wondering about the distincti

[DB-SIG] SQL DDL

2006-11-16 Thread Art Protin
Dear folks, In earlier messages, I noted that the Specification (v2.0) does not adequately express that the "operation" argument is SQL (although the coverage of the API in "PYHON in a Nutshell is hardly ambiguous at all). Now I am wondering about the distinction between SQL DQL (Data Qu