Re: [DB-SIG] Clarification of cursor.arraysize

2006-12-19 Thread Carsten Haese
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:28 -0500, Art Protin wrote: > I am probably being dense here, but ... This seems to be like saying > "The implementor is free to transfer parameters for .executemany() in > groups of 17, or not." Why mention it at all? It's an implementation hint. Take it or leave it. > D

Re: [DB-SIG] Clarification of cursor.arraysize

2006-12-19 Thread Art Protin
Dear folks, Carsten Haese wrote: On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 16:56 -0500, Art Protin wrote: Dear folks, I find yet again that I am confused by what I read in pep-0249. This time it is the last line describing the attribute of cursor objects named .arraysize (I quote here both paragraphs):

Re: [DB-SIG] Clarification of cursor.arraysize

2006-12-19 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 2006-12-19 01:34, Carsten Haese wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 01:01 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> On 2006-12-18 22:56, Art Protin wrote: > >>> While I am bothering you good people with my silly questions, I >>> might just as well tack on another: if one invokes .executemany with a >>