On Sunday 12 August 2007 00:33, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:10:34 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > The iron-clad, all-encompassing, golden rule is this: If something looks
> > like a parameter marker and occurs in a place where a parameter marker
> > is syntact
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 18:33 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:10:34 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The iron-clad, all-encompassing, golden rule is this: If something looks
> > like a parameter marker and occurs in a place where a parameter marker
> > is syntactic
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:10:34 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:32 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:14:16 +0200 Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 11 August 2007 10:25, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well, InformixD
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:32 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:14:16 +0200 Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 August 2007 10:25, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, InformixDB has a way that works. I can think of at least two
> > > other databases that it won't
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:14:16 +0200 Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 August 2007 10:25, Mike Meyer wrote:
> >
> > Well, InformixDB has a way that works. I can think of at least two
> > other databases that it won't work for - or at least, will have
> > surprising consequences
On Saturday 11 August 2007 10:25, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> Well, InformixDB has a way that works. I can think of at least two
> other databases that it won't work for - or at least, will have
> surprising consequences for users. That's not the same thing as the
> paramstyle having a way.
Can you name
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:13:57 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 04:25 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:24:17 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I said, there is a defined way: Don't treat things that look like
> > > parame
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 04:25 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:24:17 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I said, there is a defined way: Don't treat things that look like
> > parameter markers as parameter markers if they appear inside
> > apostrophes. This may requ
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:24:17 -0400 Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 16:11 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > 2) You have to use '%%' to get a real '%' into the query.
> > As for #2, yes, you have to use '%%' to insert a single '%'. How do
> > the other paramstyles deal wit
