It's my understanding that a lot of executemany() implementations will actually
run the given statement once per each element in the sequence of parameters.
such as, it creates a prepared statement handle for the statement, then runs
each parameter set. a driver that works this way can documen
My initial thought is that the driver must pass the executemany
parameters on to the server without changing the order of the
parameters. Maybe that should be explicitly stated in the spec. Once
the server has the parameters then I think the behaviour becomes DBMS
dependent. I guess my philosophy i
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 19:15, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
> […] The scope here is, should pep-249 add some verbiage: "the order in
> which parameters are processed by executemany() should not be assumed to be
> in the order the parameters were given". […]
>
Sounds good to me.
Erlend
>
_
