>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Bicking
> After that it's
>potentially entirely up to the database driver, though of course some
>uniformity is nice. Typical DSNs, from what I can tell, are parsed in
>an up-front manner into a set of keys and values; though
Dittmar, Daniel wrote:
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Bicking
>>After that it's
>>potentially entirely up to the database driver, though of course some
>>uniformity is nice. Typical DSNs, from what I can tell, are parsed in
>>an up-front manner into a se
>pydbapi-mx.ODBC.Windows://:@sqlserver.example.com/?DA
>TABASE=test
>
>Looking at this URI I don't think that the URI-approach is
>going to make things any easier for the user in setting up
>things.
If I understood Ian right, he doesn't wants to improve on
import dbmodule
session = dbmodule.connec
Ummm... a little caution here. Don't get comfortable assuming that ODBC
is a dependable measure of how to access a data base.As is typical
of Micro$oft, and many other companies which have grown too large and
self-important, they have changed the rules. ODBC, having become an
industry quasi-st
Dittmar, Daniel wrote:
Of course, following that pattern you could get
dbapi:jdbc:postgresql://... which feels awfully weird to me.
a) I'd prefer pydbapi: as a prefix. That way, someone looking at a
configuration file could at least get the notion that any problems might
be related to some Python
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
c) Should username and password be used similar to other protocols?
pydbapi:://[:@][:
/
This is not URI conformant (AFAIK): you cannot have multiple
schemes separated by colons.
pydbapi-://...
Well, I think it's up to scheme to parse the rest of the URI, so the
scheme would
I vote for:
pydbapi-://[[:[EMAIL
PROTECTED][:]]/[][?param1=...¶m2=...]
Where:
dbms: Name of the database server implementation (mysql, postgresql,
oracle, etc.); map server implementation names to callables (factory
functions) that should be passed a mapping of all the above parameters
and retu
Andy Dustman wrote:
I vote for:
pydbapi-://[[:[EMAIL
PROTECTED][:]]/[][?param1=...¶m2=...]
Where:
dbms: Name of the database server implementation (mysql, postgresql,
oracle, etc.); map server implementation names to callables (factory
functions) that should be passed a mapping of all the above pa
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 03:05, Michael Husmann wrote:
> Carsten Haese wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody:
> >
> > I have discovered that the functionality for connecting Python to an
> > Informix database is currently in a frustrating state of neglect. The
> > link to Kinfxdb is dead, and informixdb does
Vernon Cole wrote:
> Ummm... a little caution here. Don't get comfortable assuming that ODBC
> is a dependable measure of how to access a data base.As is typical
> of Micro$oft, and many other companies which have grown too large and
> self-important, they have changed the rules. ODBC, having
10 matches
Mail list logo
