Re: [DB-SIG] query - prepared statment

2006-02-11 Thread David Rushby
--- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm -1 on introducing a whole new class to encapsulate these deeper > diagnostics. > [...] > If the programmer needs more than one prepared statement, nothing is > stopping them from creating more than one cursor. But this is akin to limiting Connecti

Re: [DB-SIG] query - prepared statment

2006-02-11 Thread Carsten Haese
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:41:41 -0800 (PST), David Rushby wrote > --- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm -1 on introducing a whole new class to encapsulate these deeper > > diagnostics. > > [...] > > If the programmer needs more than one prepared statement, nothing is > > stopping them f

Re: [DB-SIG] query - prepared statment

2006-02-11 Thread Jeff Lewis
--- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:41:41 -0800 (PST), David > Rushby wrote > > --- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm -1 on introducing a whole new class to > encapsulate these deeper > > > diagnostics. > > > [...] > > > If the programmer needs mor

Re: [DB-SIG] query - prepared statment

2006-02-11 Thread Carsten Haese
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:30:42 -0800 (PST), Jeff Lewis wrote > --- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:41:41 -0800 (PST), David > > Rushby wrote > > > --- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm -1 on introducing a whole new class to > > encapsulate these