Dear Sandra,
Thank you for this overview. You have cleared some of the mists of time
and I am appreciative for that.
It appears that over time, the 'root' of the conceptual model shifted
from the AS holder to the IP space holder. Interesting.
Kind regards,
Job
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:37:47
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 4:08 PM, den is via db-wg wrote:
>
> Hi Colleagues
>
> Rob is correct, option 1 has been proposed before and it was opposed.
> Whilst neither supporting nor opposing anyone's views let me ask a
> couple of questions. I think these questions need addressing even if
> it is
>> why not go the other, more positive, direction, and identify authorised
>> data with RIPE-AUTH or whatever? no need to be pejorative.
>
> s/RIPE-NONAUTH/RIPE-OTHERRIR/
can there be cases where the source is not an rir? rfc1918 for example?
s/RIPE-NONAUTH/JOB-HATES/ :)
randy
Bill,
a single issue has been addressed in your email, relating to the RIPE
NCC's actions in dealing with a violation of the RIPE DB T&Cs.
The core issue of the complaint, namely the actions of one of the WG
co-chairs, remains completely unaddressed.
Can you kindly inform the working group wheth
Randy Bush via db-wg wrote:
> why not go the other, more positive, direction, and identify authorised
> data with RIPE-AUTH or whatever? no need to be pejorative.
s/RIPE-NONAUTH/RIPE-OTHERRIR/
Nick
>> this is a brilliant exercise to see how far the community will bend over
>> in pseudo-politeness while it is being slimed and abused.
>
> I am nothing if not polite!
>
> I've been through this before, it's far from pleasant, but I'd hoped
> the community had learned from my mistakes on talking
Randy Bush via db-wg wrote on 17/10/2017 18:25:
this is a brilliant exercise to see how far the community will bend over
in pseudo-politeness while it is being slimed and abused.
I am nothing if not polite!
I've been through this before, it's far from pleasant, but I'd hoped the
community ha
