Re: [db-wg] NWI-5 Out of region ROUTE(6)/AUT-NUM objects implementation request

2018-02-14 Thread Randy Bush via db-wg
This can be a separate effort. However, what I did not mention earlier is that we probably should disallow the creation of new out-of-region AUT-NUM objects if they are no longer required to authorise ROUTE(6) objects. >> >> how long do you think it will be before there are no

Re: [db-wg] NWI-5 Out of region ROUTE(6)/AUT-NUM objects implementation request

2018-02-14 Thread Randy Bush via db-wg
> My personal (and I stress personal) opinion moving forward, is that > the use of an IRR really does not sit well with the management side of > delegation of authority in a distributed model that we have right now. > > If we move to a model where the IRR/RPSL "maintainer" is understood to > be do

Re: [db-wg] NWI-5 Out of region ROUTE(6)/AUT-NUM objects implementation request

2018-02-14 Thread Job Snijders via db-wg
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:59:22PM +0900, Randy Bush via db-wg wrote: > >> This can be a separate effort. However, what I did not mention > >> earlier is that we probably should disallow the creation of new > >> out-of-region AUT-NUM objects if they are no longer required to > >> authorise ROUTE(6)

Re: [db-wg] NWI-5 Out of region ROUTE(6)/AUT-NUM objects implementation request

2018-02-14 Thread George Michaelson via db-wg
My personal (and I stress personal) opinion moving forward, is that the use of an IRR really does not sit well with the management side of delegation of authority in a distributed model that we have right now. If we move to a model where the IRR/RPSL "maintainer" is understood to be documentation