Re: [db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11

2020-09-22 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Just for my understanding, do you need a policy for the NCC to offer "whowas[1]" service? [1] https://www.apnic.net/static/whowas-ui/# Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:55, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote on 22/09/2020 03:13: > > I'm no

Re: [db-wg] remove bogon prefixes in the RIPE IRR NON-AUTH DB?

2018-10-06 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 at 04:13 netravnen--- via db-wg wrote: > ... > > Sometimes you will wonder why the suggestion has yet to be implemented. > (and when disallowing MARTIANS was first suggested) > > ... Does this issue apply to most of the IRRs out there? Certainly no issues in the APNIC. But i

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-18 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Hi Hank, Following up with Cisco POC, I got this response. "We are in the process of retrieving this /20 back. An ARIN ticket was opened for this." I checked the ARIN allocation file until 1st March so it's been more than 4 months since ARIN marked this prefix "reserved". ftp://ftp.arin.net/pub/

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-15 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Hi Hank, On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 at 04:32 Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote: > On 13/07/2018 18:40, Sandra Murphy via db-wg wrote: > > While we are on the topic, anyone have an idea about Cisco and > 66.187.208.0/20? Same issue, just because there is a bad entry in the RADB many transits are accepti

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-13 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
with non > authenticated data. > > cheers > denis > co-chair DB-WG > > > > -- > *From:* Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg > *To:* Geoff Huston > *Cc:* RIPE Database Working Group > *Sent:* Thursday, 12 July 2018, 18:40 > *Subject:* Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE > > H

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-12 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Hi Geoff, > Of course Twitter is doing nothing uniquely unusual in this respect, as > these are just 7 examples from a pool of some 300 announcements of > unallocated address space (a list of such bogons can be found at > http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Bogons) > :) > > - Why is Twitter anno

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-12 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Yup sending an email to support (RIPE) for clarification. But Twitter NOC is adamant that they are not doing the wrong thing (advertising unallocated address space) because it shows in RADB-GRS via RIPE Whois On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 7:39 pm, Christoffer Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 13:2

Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-12 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
RIPE. On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 6:20 pm, Christoffer Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 11:24, Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg > wrote: > > I would like to understand the difference between these 2 results for > the same prefix. > > > > Source: GRS > > > https://apps

[db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE

2018-07-12 Thread Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg
Hi, I would like to understand the difference between these 2 results for the same prefix. Source: GRS https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/query?bflag=true&source=GRS&searchtext=188.64.224.0%2F21#resultsSection Source: RIPE https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/query?bflag&searchtext=188.64.224.0