To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 21:48:26 +
2010 ---
fs->aw: looking at the changes which came in with the above-mentioned CWS, I
sti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115557
User r4zoli changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 14:28:44 +
2010 ---
good catch ...
m62 integrated CWS dba33h, so this one likely fixed the bug.
m7
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115557
User r4zoli changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115557
--- Additional comments from r4z...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 14:18:54
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=74721)
bugdoc with form
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115557
Issue #|115557
Summary|OOo crash on form, when anchor form control to frame
Component|Database access
Version|OO
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 13:54:28 +
2010 ---
I tried to reproduce the described defect under Windows with NON-PRO
installatio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 13:14:59 +
2010 ---
- Yes, theoretically an empty ViewTransformation could happen and i already
thou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 12:49:57 +
2010 ---
Thanks for the investigations.
However, this leaves quite some of questions:
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 12:24:15 +
2010 ---
works in DEV300.m51, is broken in DEV300.m52
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User aw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 12:06:57 +
2010 ---
AW: Thought about also initializing ViewInformation2D before
ViewObjectContactPr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 11:58:23 +
2010 ---
AW: Indeed, SwEditWin::Paint (and thus the whole DrawingLayer repaint) is never
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 11:45:03 +
2010 ---
AW: It looks like the ViewInformation2D at the ObjectContact (Its a
ObjectContac
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68267
--- Additional comments from thocurgi...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:31:55
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=74711)
orlistat med
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66855
--- Additional comments from thocurgi...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:30:33
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=74706)
virility ex patch
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Additional comments from thocurgi...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:25:19
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=74699)
viagra oral jelly
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62245
--- Additional comments from thocurgi...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:23:32
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=74692)
levitra tv fix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:06:52 +
2010 ---
Ouch. This broke between DEV300.m50 and DEV300.m60 :-\ (Don't have too many of
*
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 10:03:19 +
2010 ---
fs->aw: it doesn't happen with an ordinary rectangular shape, however, this
isn'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User aw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User md changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
User vitriol changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
26 matches
Mail list logo