To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114109
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114111
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114106
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114105
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 26 13:24:20 +
2010 ---
ok, now i've found out where the NaNs become zeroes:
in SwXCell::getValue():
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 14:15:48 +
2010 ---
creating the report with OOO 3.2.1 yields cells like this:
table:table-cell
Subcomponent|SRB
Assigned to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:17:53 +
2010 ---
so after fixing that NaN thing i've thrown the generated .odt file into the
validator, and said validator expressed
Subcomponent|SRB
Assigned to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:21:58 +
2010 ---
upload:///Table1_fixed.odt/styles.xml:Error:Invalid root element:
office:document-content
upload:///Table1_fixed.odt
Priority|P2
Subcomponent|SRB
Assigned to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:26:47 +
2010 ---
upload:///Table1_fixed.odt/content.xml[2,3830]:Error:attribute
style:text-combine-start-char has a bad value
Priority|P2
Subcomponent|SRB
Assigned to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:31:55 +
2010 ---
upload:///Table1_fixed.odt/content.xml[10,1640]:Error:element table:table-cell
is missing boolean-value
to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:39:33 +
2010 ---
this is perfectly valid, but i still don't like it:
the report builder seems to write into meta.xml the same generator string that
OOo itself writes.
meta:generator
Subcomponent|SRB
Assigned to|oj
Reported by|mst
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 16:51:26 +
2010 ---
now i've generated a spreadsheet document (from the same file attached to issue
112652), and it has the boolean-value problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114106
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114106
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 19:52:35 +
2010 ---
the second error is not in fact caused by the first;
the ODF schema prescribes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 19:54:15 +
2010 ---
the obvious thing (removing the text-combine-start-char and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114111
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114111
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 20:00:49 +
2010 ---
this problem is caused by using Double.toString() (implicitly via String
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110236
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110236
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108489
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108489
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 22 10:28:30 +
2009 ---
just for the record: this bug breaks the following unoapi tests:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91780
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 18 08:19:18 +
2008 ---
hi,
i just thought hey, that sounds just like my assertion!...
so, i introduced
31 matches
Mail list logo
