To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 06:06:30 +
2007 ---
Hi Martin,
I'm the 2nd of the three base developers. :-) One of my parts are the dr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 23:08:25 +
2007 ---
hello Ocke, you take as a new owner?
please make some proposals about the solution
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 19:25:17 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 78634 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 17 22:28:44 -0800
2007 ---
Martin,
> well Frank, I wonder why you are going to argue with me.
You didn't *rea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 17 09:08:33 -0800
2007 ---
well Frank, I wonder why you are going to argue with me.
until now I believed, that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 00:47:38 -0800
2007 ---
> is or will there be anyone in developer-team at oo.o who knows what
> file-based d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 06:43:20 -0800
2007 ---
frankly, for my knowledge:
is or will there be anyone in developer-team at oo.o who
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 2 14:02:48 -0800
2007 ---
Agree on widening at least OS and version info (though I don't know how to do
it).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 2 09:59:07 -0800
2007 ---
Presumably issue 42464 was raised because it was not clear that this RFE covered
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 2 07:43:41 -0800
2007 ---
jwt wrote: "It seems unclear what this RFE covers. It is already possible to
run qu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 29 09:58:38 -0800
2006 ---
It seems unclear what this RFE covers. It is already possible to run queries on
lin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 29 07:47:05 -0800
2006 ---
I agree that doing queries on multiple tables (or on a combination of tables &
othe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
User timdeaton changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 23:59:09 -0700
2006 ---
overlooked this yesterday:
> Is there a work-around for this issue by using and ODBC
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 09:30:54 -0700
2006 ---
Silly Me! It has been about a year or so since I last looked into this and the
test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 08:10:25 -0700
2006 ---
sorry, but dBase isn't OOo's native database file format. HSQLDB is OOo's native
dat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 07:52:36 -0700
2006 ---
Is there a work-around for this issue by using and ODBC driver or some other
similar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 07:17:31 -0700
2006 ---
I didn't mean fixing this would be a no brainer. I mean the decision to fix it
shou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 06:30:38 -0700
2006 ---
dBase does not support joins. dBase is a file format, not an application. What
you r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 06:22:19 -0700
2006 ---
I know but I was just curious if that might be the cause of the confusion.
Anyway,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 05:59:00 -0700
2006 ---
Even in dBase mode, multiple table linking and queries are available and have
been a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 05:54:26 -0700
2006 ---
I see. They think you can't even do this in dbase. Is the confusion due to the
fact
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 05:44:23 -0700
2006 ---
There are no concrete plans to fix this? How can that be? Isn't this one of
the mo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 10 05:44:08 -0700
2006 ---
On the thread for issue 49973 (marked as a duplicate of this one):
--- Additiona
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 9 23:43:35 -0700
2006 ---
My time machine is broken, so I cannote tell about the future, sorry :)
In fact, th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 8 15:19:04 -0700
2006 ---
it would be great to hear, what the outcome of this issue will be ...
Martin h.
--
26 matches
Mail list logo