To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 06:57:01 -0800
2005 ---
mozooo is "ready for QA now"
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 06:51:18 -0800
2005 ---
My patch was already committed so I think we can mark this as fixed.
You can count
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 00:59:58 -0800
2005 ---
I agree. I suggest
- checking in Pavel's fix, so that this works on Solaris/SPARC.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 3 14:49:44 -0800
2005 ---
A polite reminder: Can we please set this issue to fixed? Are there different
probl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 16:03:01 -0800
2005 ---
I forgot to add some comments for that patch. It is basically what I needed to
do t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User spaceacademy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 02:57:53 -0800
2005 ---
building it once is no problem in a manually tweaked SO environment. but this
doesn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 01:25:29 -0800
2005 ---
hjs: but anyway: you have to produce the .zip files in youe environment at least
on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 02:36:59 -0800
2005 ---
the version of GNU cp currently found in SO solaris environment is 3.16 (we
might n
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 14:25:28 -0800
2005 ---
windly: it works, but I'm against such solution because ti only hides the real
prob
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 01:51:20 -0800
2005 ---
Not really - ause?
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 01:41:32 -0800
2005 ---
I find a walkthrough:
We try -L first, if it failed then we skip -L. Look like this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 01:17:36 -0800
2005 ---
Hi,Frank
Do you have any idea on the versions of gnucp?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 24 23:19:45 -0800
2005 ---
With my patch:
$ pwd
/home/oo/BuildDir/ooo_SRC680_m73_src/moz
$ ls -l unxsols4.pro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 24 13:20:33 -0800
2005 ---
My GNUCOPY is:
$ $GNUCOPY --version
cp (coreutils) 4.5.4
--help contains:
-L,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 24 13:11:57 -0800
2005 ---
I probably see the problem now 8)
I have just removed all my changes from moz modu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 19:38:01 -0800
2005 ---
The gnucp included in so build env does not support -L option, that is why I add
a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 08:31:44 -0800
2005 ---
With this small change OOo m73 compiled completely.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 06:43:24 -0800
2005 ---
The project moz itself compiles fine on Solaris/SPARC with
$ CC -V
CC: Sun C++ 5.5
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 02:05:01 -0800
2005 ---
fs: I still have to confirm the build work on Solaris/SPARC, but have no time
for i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
This issue depends on issue 40544, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 04:48:57 -0800
2005 ---
Building installset
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 02:23:59 -0800
2005 ---
build confirmed with
FreeBSD 5.3/i386 + gcc 3.4.1 visibility fix and enum patch
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 22:34:43 -0800
2005 ---
resyncing to m72
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 10:27:32 -0800
2005 ---
CWS mozooo and therefore this issue doesn't depend on issue 17187. That is a
sepera
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 17 10:58:08 -0800
2005 ---
I can successfully build on the following platforms:
- GNU/Linux on x86 with gcc-3
31 matches
Mail list logo
