To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 00:25:38 -0700
2005 ---
Works fine and thanks for the patch :)
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 3 03:34:07 -0700
2005 ---
Frank : The problem is still there, tested with your attached patch on m92.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 18 05:58:01 -0700
2005 ---
reassign to fs
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 02:50:25 -0800
2005 ---
Jayant, could you try the attached patch? (still cannot reproduce this due to
diffe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 21:35:47 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, I just saw the "~ORoadmap" in the stack, and thought it's the same problem
as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 22:28:06 -0800
2005 ---
Frank, I tried with raodmap.cxx (There is a new function GrabFoucs In this
file).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 03:21:42 -0800
2005 ---
Ah! Jayant, could you please try revision 1.7 of
svtools/source/control/roadmap.cxx
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User jayant_madavi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 02:46:46 -0800
2005 ---
Agreed :) .The patch is just workaround :). No idea why the attached trace in
not s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 01:13:27 -0800
2005 ---
Sorry, but the fix makes no sense. If mpWindowImpl is NULL then the window was
alre
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 00:52:19 -0800
2005 ---
This is pretty streange. mpWindowImpl should never be NULL, except the window
has a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 00:38:46 -0800
2005 ---
Just wondering how this bug got away from alpha testing ! Any way attached a
simple
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User jayant_madavi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User nagashree changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45899
User nagashree changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
21 matches
Mail list logo
