[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2008-11-06 Thread mechtilde
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User mechtilde changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2007-08-09 Thread oj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User oj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2007-08-09 Thread oj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User oj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2006-10-31 Thread oj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User oj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2006-10-25 Thread clu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User clu changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2006-08-22 Thread pitonyak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 13:18:13 -0700 2006 --- I downloaded a development build of 2.0.4 under windows. resultSet.getString() cor

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2006-08-21 Thread pitonyak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 22:27:19 -0700 2006 --- I tested 2.0.3 on Linux FC4. For a time stamp: resultSet.getString() does return h

[dba-issues] [Issue 55949] TimeStamp fields are not c onsistent in fractional seconds.

2006-08-21 Thread clu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55949 User clu changed the following: What|Old value |New value