To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 01:56:53 -0800
2006 ---
fs->ebischoff: msc suggested to add a check for a maximum KDE version, but to
make
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 02:06:48 -0800
2006 ---
I don't like the idea of a maximum version, be it configurable or not,
because i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 02:17:19 -0800
2006 ---
I don't agree to "obscure": We could point the user (in the error message which
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 02:27:19 -0800
2006 ---
Okay, not "obscure", but at least "very technical".
And I know how it happens. S
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 02:40:38 -0800
2006 ---
I think I have a satisfying solution. And it is also much simpler.
Let's define
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 04:33:44 -0800
2006 ---
KDE 3.5 works with the driver, this is tested. Perhaps you could even convince
me :
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 04:12:22 -0800
2006 ---
OK. Let me think about a better solution.
And let's wait for Tobias answer. At l
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 06:01:36 -0800
2006 ---
okay, so we agre that
- I add a maximum-check, currently checking against 3.5.0
- I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 06:31:41 -0800
2006 ---
Yes, we do agree on everything. Add:
- do not test release number
I will do the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:38:35 -0800
2006 ---
1) The driver works with KDE 3.5: ah this is good news. I only have 3.4.2 at
ho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 05:46:21 -0800
2006 ---
Ah, just a detail: no need to care about the "release number". Only the
"major" an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 04:20:38 -0800
2006 ---
Something else:
Run time tests are fine, but usually, in the Linux world, proble
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User ebischoff changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 10:52:34 -0800
2006 ---
Tobias just kindly answered:
Well, we are on the step to KDE 4.0, that means
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 08:44:37 -0800
2006 ---
I have attached a patch which is less evolved than the one that I had in mind,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 9 02:12:34 -0800
2006 ---
I submitted issue 60248 for the patch in config_office.
Eric, I don't think we're i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
User tbo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
23 matches
Mail list logo
