To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 24 10:39:25 +
2009 ---
CWS dba31h_OOO310 *has* been integrated. See f.e.
svn log -v -r267835
or
svn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User kz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 20:53:45 +
2009 ---
Just tested this in my latest installation set of dba31h - there the issue is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 21:09:55 +
2009 ---
fs-oj: forget about the investigation ...
it seems that the complete CWS dba31h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
Issue #|97032
Summary|no .lck file created anymore when connecting to an emb
|edded HSQLDB
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 19:35:44 +
2008 ---
fs-oj: most probably a regression of issue 91920, which upgraded HSQLDB to
16 matches
Mail list logo