Thanks. I;ve applied something like that. Let me know if it's okay for you.
Tim.
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 03:41:49PM -0400, Jeff Urlwin wrote:
> This is having trouble getting through to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Urlwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Se
Thanks. Applied.
Tim.
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:28:00PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> --- DBI.pm 2004-03-11 14:45:38.0 +0100
> +++ DBI.pm.new 2004-05-24 14:26:36.0 +0200
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ for (qw(trace_msg set_err parse_trace_fl
>
> use strict;
>
> -DBI->trace(split
This is having trouble getting through to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Urlwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:19 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: DBI Patch [SVN version] fix for t\10examp.t
Tim,
As I discussed in my e-mails regarding
Tim,
As I discussed in my e-mails regarding DBI issues when I tried to build, the
following patch allows me to test and build successfully, with your
threading update in place. The second line change is not necessary to make
things pass, but it seems more reasonable to me to make the description
--- DBI.pm 2004-03-11 14:45:38.0 +0100
+++ DBI.pm.new 2004-05-24 14:26:36.0 +0200
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ for (qw(trace_msg set_err parse_trace_fl
use strict;
-DBI->trace(split '=', $ENV{DBI_TRACE}, 2) if $ENV{DBI_TRACE};
+DBI->trace(split /=/, $ENV{DBI_TRACE}, 2) if $ENV{DBI_T
