info API for transact resolution on death

2004-08-13 Thread Darren Duncan
This message follows after my last "commoditization suggestion #1" email. For a context, I reference this portion of the DBI user documentation, under disconnect(): The transaction behaviour of the disconnect method is, sadly, undefined. Some database systems (such as Oracle and Ingres) will a

sth after a prepare (was: Re: DBI Roadmap)

2004-08-13 Thread Henri Asseily
Someone has logged a bug against DBD::Informix because it wasn't cleaning up properly as a handle was destroyed. It turns out that the statement-level active flag was not set. But, simply setting it on means DBD::Informix runs foul of all sorts of issues during destroy. Of course it's a bug t

Re: DBI-1.43 + DBD-CSV-0.21

2004-08-13 Thread jeff
Thanks much. I'll be returning from travel early next week and will look into this then. -- Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Jan Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 02:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: ''Tim Bunce'', [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DB

Re: DBI-1.43 + DBD-CSV-0.21

2004-08-13 Thread Jan Dubois
Merijn wrote: > >HP-UX 11i (11.11) + perl-5.8.5-dor + DBI-1.43 + DBD-CSV-0.21 > >Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed >--- >t/40bindparam.t 281 3.57% 14 >Failed 1/14 test script

test message 6:25

2004-08-13 Thread Darren Duncan
Some of my mail seems to be getting lost. Just seeing if this message gets through the list. Don't reply to it. -- sayeth I

RE: DBI Roadmap

2004-08-13 Thread Jeff Urlwin
> Comments welcome. Just some random thoughts that came from reading this. What about Multiple result set statements/more_results? (i.e. select * from foo; select * from bar; or calling stored procs which have multiple statements within them as per Sybase & SQL*Server, etc) [snip] > > =head2

Re: DBI Roadmap

2004-08-13 Thread Darren Duncan
At 5:42 PM +0200 8/10/04, H.Merijn Brand wrote: Unsure if this is the right spot, but in writing the DBD I found the unidirection from handle to handle quite restrictive. Statement handles know what database handle they belong to, but database handles don't know what statement handles are opened on

Re: DBI Roadmap

2004-08-13 Thread Darren Duncan
At 5:42 PM +0200 8/10/04, H.Merijn Brand wrote: Unsure if this is the right spot, but in writing the DBD I found the unidirection from handle to handle quite restrictive. Statement handles know what database handle they belong to, but database handles don't know what statement handles are opened on