Re: [sqlite] request to become co-maintainer of DBD::SQLite

2009-01-16 Thread yair lenga
Hi, I would like to highlight the fact the in large corporations, bumping DBI to new version is a major issue, as the module serve as a foundation for hundreds of applications, which must be retested on every change. As a result, large companies will bump DBI version every few years. Also, large

Re: Async I/O with DBI?

2009-01-16 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:01:32PM +, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote: Marc, what would need to be added to the DBI (or DBD::Gofer) to support asynchronous use via the Coro module? Method 1, add hooks to DBD::Gofer: Right now, the only sensible way to go is to use DBD::Gofer and add

Re: [sqlite] request to become co-maintainer of DBD::SQLite

2009-01-16 Thread Hildo Biersma
I am not sure agree. Companies that don't upgrade DBI releases are unlikely to upgrade DBD drivers more frequently; and they're always free to use older DBD releases. We don't want to hold developers hostage to the tendency of a few companies to be slow in upgrades. At my workplace, a large