Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:54:43PM +, Martin Evans wrote:
>>> The next question is whether overflowing to an NV should be an error.
>>> I'm thinking we could adopt these semantics for bind_col types:
>>>
>>> SQL_INTEGER IV or UV via sv_2iv(sv) with error on overflow
>> thi
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:43:28PM +, Martin Evans wrote:
> I'm presuming you missed a bit off your patch:
Yes, sorry, I was just "throwing it out there" for discussion of the
general approach/principles. None so far.
Tim.
Martin Evans wrote:
> Tim Bunce wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:54:43PM +, Martin Evans wrote:
The next question is whether overflowing to an NV should be an error.
I'm thinking we could adopt these semantics for bind_col types:
SQL_INTEGER IV or UV via sv_2iv(sv) wi
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:05:11PM +, Martin Evans wrote:
> Martin Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> +/* Convert a simple string representation of a value into a more specific
> >> + * perl type based on an sql_type value.
> >> + * The semantics of SQL standard TYPE values are interpreted _very_
> >> l