Re: Fwd: DBD::File updates and DBD::PO

2010-09-01 Thread Steffen Winkler
Hello together, thank you for hard work writing this skeleton. It looks very useful. So I see what is driver specific and what is common. Last weekend I have done a lot for DBD::PO. The first question was: Who opens the file? At work it is horrorable now. Every day a lot of work and a chaotic

Re: [svn:dbi] r14361 - dbi/trunk/t

2010-09-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > 2010/8/31 Tim Bunce : > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:49:10PM -0700, hmbr...@cvs.perl.org wrote: > >> Log: > >> Fix for failing t/50 when old SQL::Statement available (e.g. 1.16) > > > > Does this fix http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/rep

Re: Any reasons not to release DBI 1.614?

2010-09-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:56:22AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:07:46 -0700, Darren Duncan > wrote: > > > Tim Bunce wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > > >> On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: > > >> > > >>> It's back

Re: Any reasons not to release DBI 1.614?

2010-09-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/1 H.Merijn Brand : > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:07:46 -0700, Darren Duncan > wrote: > >> Tim Bunce wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: >> >> On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: >> >> >> >>> It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more like

Re: [svn:dbi] r14361 - dbi/trunk/t

2010-09-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/8/31 Tim Bunce : > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:49:10PM -0700, hmbr...@cvs.perl.org wrote: >> Log: >> Fix for failing t/50 when old SQL::Statement available (e.g. 1.16) > > Does this fix http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/8392757 ? No, because this fixes t/50dbm_simple.t and the error is in