On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:43:05 +0200, Jens Rehsack
wrote:
> 2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand :
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the
> >> backward
> >> compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
2010/9/16 Tim Bunce :
> No tests?
The tests are already in there - t/5?dbm* test for these features, especially
t/52dbm_complex.t. This is more a refactoring to allow better implementation
in DBD::CSV - which has a separate test for it's special case.
> Tim.
/Jens
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:4
No tests?
Tim.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48:36PM -0700, rehs...@cvs.perl.org wrote:
> Author: REHSACK
> Date: Wed Sep 15 22:48:35 2010
> New Revision: 14407
>
> Modified:
>dbi/trunk/Changes
>dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/DBM.pm
>dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/File.pm
>dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/File/Developers.p
2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand :
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the backward
>> compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
>> 0001-add-test-case-for-rt61168.patch
>> first.
>>
>> As we have no reaso
