On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:24:51 +0100, "Martin J. Evans"
wrote:
> Some might disagree but DB2 is a main
> one I no longer have access to (please contact me if you use DBD::DB2
> and are prepared to spare half an hour or so to modify examples I have
> which verify unicode support). Of course, if y
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 15:24, Martin J. Evans wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 22:38, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
>> I've not had time to devote to this thread. Sorry.
>>
>> I'd be grateful if someone could post a summary of it if/when it
>> approaches some kind of consensus.
>>
>> I don't think there is a "kind of
On 04/10/2011 22:38, Tim Bunce wrote:
I've not had time to devote to this thread. Sorry.
I'd be grateful if someone could post a summary of it if/when it
approaches some kind of consensus.
Thanks.
Tim.
I don't think there is a "kind of consensus" right now (although some
useful discussion whi
I've not had time to devote to this thread. Sorry.
I'd be grateful if someone could post a summary of it if/when it
approaches some kind of consensus.
Thanks.
Tim.
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:20:10PM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:19:32PM -0400, Brendan Byrd wrote:
>
> For a start it would be nice to have a matrix up somewhere listing
> DBMSes against SQL constructs, so I can look up, for instance, against
> which types of DBD backend
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:19:32PM -0400, Brendan Byrd wrote:
> [...], the Perl community in general needs this. Developers need to just
> grab some modules via CPAN, describe the relational models (if they don't
> already exist), and have the flow of data *just work!* [...]
I would love to have
