Re: DBD::Oracle - rt13865.t

2012-12-13 Thread Scott
Do you have the DROP ANY TABLE privilege set for the userid? That is the only DROP TABLE priv I can see, so I probably need to have the dba grant it to my install-test user. On 12/13/2012 11:03 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: On 13/12/12 16:38, Scott wrote: I have to comment out the 'DROP TABLE

Re: DBD::Oracle - rt13865.t

2012-12-13 Thread Martin J. Evans
On 13/12/12 16:38, Scott wrote: I have to comment out the 'DROP TABLE' check to get this test to run. In Oracle, AFAIK, there is not a DROP TABLE privilege. If you can create it, you can drop it. Does this test not run for everyone? unless (( $priv{'CREATE TABLE'} or $priv{'CREATE A

DBD::Oracle - rt13865.t

2012-12-13 Thread Scott
I have to comment out the 'DROP TABLE' check to get this test to run. In Oracle, AFAIK, there is not a DROP TABLE privilege. If you can create it, you can drop it. Does this test not run for everyone? unless (( $priv{'CREATE TABLE'} or $priv{'CREATE ANY TABLE'} ) ){ #and ( $

Re: [rt.cpan.org #81516] Test failures due to hash randomisation in perl 5.17.6

2012-12-13 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 22:14:00 +, Tim Bunce wrote: > > Remaining question in that proposal: where's the fence between "must > > be last" and "insert unnamed attrs here"? > > I don't know, but I would like a working DBI for 5.17.6+ before too long. After some discussion on IRC, we agreed on t

Re: Topics DBI::DBD::SqlEngine & derived

2012-12-13 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:52:06 +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi Merijn, Reply to summarize progress > we should talk about > - how to modify DBI::DBD::SqlEngine::TableSource and >DBI::DBD::SqlEngine::DataSource to allow chaining >(eg. fetch via http/ssh & decompress) Still open, planned f

Re: [rt.cpan.org #81516] Test failures due to hash randomisation in perl 5.17.6

2012-12-13 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 12.12.12 20:34, H.Merijn Brand wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:31:44 +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: On 01.12.12 23:14, Tim Bunce wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: But back to the issue - now it seems dbm_tables is fetched earlier in some cases than f_dir whic