Am 01.07.2013 um 23:55 schrieb Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Hi all,
I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository.
We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle.
#
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:44:06 +0200, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com
wrote:
For the moment, I wouldn't spend to much brain on those cases,
as they do not affect any existing and targeted driver.
Primary goal for the first shot are:
* DBI (and bundled drivers)
* SQL::Statement (with DBI::Mock
Hi all,
I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository.
We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle.
# DESIGN
Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion points...
Topics can be removed once they're settled and the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Hi all,
I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository.
We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle.
# DESIGN
Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it
deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one
thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like
DBD::ODBC's deviations from the DBI specification at
Am 02.07.2013 um 00:56 schrieb Martin J. Evans boh...@ntlworld.com:
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves
later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me
immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's