On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:03:00 +0100, Jens Rehsack
wrote:
> 2009/12/4 H.Merijn Brand :
> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:03:54 +0100, Jens Rehsack
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 2009/12/3 H.Merijn Brand :
> >> > Any objections to me committing below change?
> >>
> >> While the originator of this request updates his t
2009/12/4 H.Merijn Brand :
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:03:54 +0100, Jens Rehsack
> wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/3 H.Merijn Brand :
>> > Any objections to me committing below change?
>>
>> While the originator of this request updates his ticket, maybe a smarter
>> implementation is reasonable:
>>
>> I could mod
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:03:54 +0100, Jens Rehsack
wrote:
> 2009/12/3 H.Merijn Brand :
> > Any objections to me committing below change?
>
> While the originator of this request updates his ticket, maybe a smarter
> implementation is reasonable:
>
> I could modify S::S opentable () to request open
2009/12/3 H.Merijn Brand :
> Any objections to me committing below change?
While the originator of this request updates his ticket, maybe a smarter
implementation is reasonable:
I could modify S::S opentable() to request opening for reading/writing,
so you could differ between LOCK_SH and LOCK_EX
Any objections to me committing below change?
--8<---
--- DBI-svn/lib/DBD/File.pm 2009-12-03 17:47:15.0 +0100
+++ DBI-svn/lib/DBD/File.pm 2009-12-03 17:49:20.0 +0100
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ sub connect ($$;$$$)
f_ext => 1, # file extension
f_schema=
