RE: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal

2001-10-17 Thread Tim Harsch
--Original Message- > From: Terrence Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal > > > > On Wednesday, October 17, 2001, at 03:23 PM, Tim Harsch wrote: >

Re: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal

2001-10-17 Thread Terrence Brannon
Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:48 AM >> To: Terrence Brannon >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal >> >> >> [moved to dbi-dev list] >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 200

RE: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal

2001-10-17 Thread Tim Harsch
hance many CGIs that hit the database... and if not sorry for the distraction... > -Original Message- > From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:48 AM > To: Terrence Brannon > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RFCs: DBI.pm source c

Re: RFCs: DBI.pm source code and Module proposal

2001-10-17 Thread Tim Bunce
[moved to dbi-dev list] On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:22:11PM -0700, Terrence Brannon wrote: > As it stands, neither the algorithm or results of DBI's prepare_cached > and connect_cached key routines are directly useable in subclasses... in > other words the actual key generated is not stored in a