Re: Metadata methods in DBI - NUM_PREC_RADIX once or twice?

effler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | cc: Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DBI Developers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Leffler/Menlo Park/IBM@IBMUS | |

Re: Metadata methods in DBI

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:04:48PM +0100, Steffen Goeldner wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Note that DATETIME_SUB is misspelled with > > an SQL_ prefix in the docs. That's wrong. Fixed now. > > Really? > > >

RE: Metadata methods in DBI

> > Yeap. I don't envy you task. You're life will be easier if > you get the latest Informix ODBC driver and the latest > DBD::ODBC (development release I think) and see how they > behave. The implementors of Informix's ODBC driver must have > faced many of these issues and addressed them in a

Re: Metadata methods in DBI

Tim Bunce wrote: > [...] > > Note that DATETIME_SUB is misspelled with > an SQL_ prefix in the docs. That's wrong. Fixed now. Really? [...] > > 2. What does the DATA_TYPE field contain when this field cont

Re: Metadata methods in DBI

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:21:12AM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > > Yet another question -- given the specifications of type_info_all and > type_info, how does type_info get hold of the SQL_DATA_TYPE, > SQL_DATETIME_SUB and INTERVAL_PRECISION fields, given that they are > not listed in the ty

Re: Metadata methods in DBI

Tim Bunce wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:16:47PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: Dear Tim (and others who've worked on the metadata methods), I'd like to check on my understanding of what's required from the metadata methods such as $dbh->tables. [...] Thanks for the feedback, Tim. {Yes, I

Re: Metadata methods in DBI

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:16:47PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > Dear Tim (and others who've worked on the metadata methods), > > I'd like to check on my understanding of what's required from the > metadata methods such as $dbh->tables. Specifically, there are three > distinct possible ways in