Re: Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release

2012-02-16 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:42:32PM +, Martin J. Evans wrote: > On 16/02/12 12:46, Tim Bunce wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:06:30PM +, Martin J. Evans wrote: > >>Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release. > >> > >>I'll do it we t

Re: Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release

2012-02-16 Thread Martin J. Evans
On 16/02/12 12:46, Tim Bunce wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:06:30PM +, Martin J. Evans wrote: Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release. I'll do it we think it should be done. I believe we have 3.19 and 3.20 is available. Devel::PPPort is mainly about helpin

Re: Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release

2012-02-16 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:06:30PM +, Martin J. Evans wrote: > Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release. > > I'll do it we think it should be done. I believe we have 3.19 and 3.20 is > available. Devel::PPPort is mainly about helping new extensions, or new co

Re: Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release

2012-02-14 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:06:30 +, "Martin J. Evans" wrote: > Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release. I think yes, as the latest release only *add*s features, so there should be no backward compat issues > I'll do it we think it should be done. I believe we

Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release

2012-02-14 Thread Martin J. Evans
Should we be updating dbipport.h before next release. I'll do it we think it should be done. I believe we have 3.19 and 3.20 is available. Martin -- Martin J. Evans Easysoft Limited http://www.easysoft.com