Re: the scope of dbi-dev (was: lifetime of prepared ...)

2004-11-24 Thread Darren Duncan
At 11:17 AM + 11/24/04, Tim Bunce wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:39:48PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > If you're developing modules that work with DBI, it is not always unreasonable to ask questions here rather than in dbi-users, though many of the questions could also be asked on dbi-

Re: the scope of dbi-dev (was: lifetime of prepared ...)

2004-11-24 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:39:48PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:20:20 -0800, Darren Duncan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First of all, thanks to those of you who replied to my question. Very > > helpful. > > > > At 3:18 PM + 11/23/04, Tim Bunce wrote: > > >You'v

Re: the scope of dbi-dev (was: lifetime of prepared ...)

2004-11-23 Thread Jonathan Leffler
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:20:20 -0800, Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, thanks to those of you who replied to my question. Very > helpful. > > At 3:18 PM + 11/23/04, Tim Bunce wrote: > >You've got a lot of good advice from others. I'll just add that > >dbi-users would ha

the scope of dbi-dev (was: lifetime of prepared ...)

2004-11-23 Thread Darren Duncan
First of all, thanks to those of you who replied to my question. Very helpful. At 3:18 PM + 11/23/04, Tim Bunce wrote: You've got a lot of good advice from others. I'll just add that dbi-users would have been a more appropriate forum for this :) Tim. Sorry. At the time, I thought dbi-dev was m