Yes.
Michael
Extranet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 03/01/2006 02:14
To:dbi-users
cc:
Subject:DBD::Sybase Stored Proc argument placeholders
In 1.00 (which I have in production) Stored Proc argument placeholders
are marked as experimental. By 1.07, the designation has been removed.
Can I s
In 1.00 (which I have in production) Stored Proc argument placeholders
are marked as experimental. By 1.07, the designation has been removed.
Can I safely use Stored Proc argument placeholders in DBD::Sybase 1.00?
Happy New Year
--
Matthew O. Persico
Perhaps use Schema::RDBMS::Foo. This would allow for non-RDBMS schema modules,
based on XML, DB files, or others.
-Original Message-
From: Tyler MacDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 3:28 PM
To: Jay Strauss
Cc: dbi-users@perl.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Module subm
Jay Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I you talking about cataloging pre-defined table layouts for specific modules
> or processes?
That, or modules that do all of their work on a database schema. Eg;
if you had a module that accepted longitudes and latitudes and built up a
waypoint da
Ok, your are right. It seems that to override the 'connect' method,
you have to put it in MySubDBI::connect package.
Thank you for your help.
On 12/30/05, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:58:02PM +0100, wernerus sebastien wrote:
> > Tim, I made the changes you su
