On 2007-01-19 12:01:29 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
system(VAR=val /path/to/your/shell/script);
Well, that worked nicely for me with Korn Shell (and would work with Bourne
Shell), but won't work with C shell (again).
On Unix-like systems the system() function always invokes /bin/sh, not
On 19/01/07 18:07, Joel Noble wrote:
Hello, all!
I'm having slow performance reading from a cursor that is returned
from a stored procedure. Network tracing and strace confirms that
a round-trip is being done to the Oracle DB to fetch each row, with no
pre-caching. Using DBI-1.52,
On Jan 20, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Some other folks may be interested in the patches I've published for
DBD::Multi recently:
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=DBD-Multi
Perhaps most interesting might be a benchmarking script I made, and
related optimization
Dear Sir./Ms.
My current server perl version is:
This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for sun4-solaris
The Bundle about DBI I using is DBI-1.37.
During building it,there is some error appearing:
sunbilldev% make
/bin/sh -c true
/bin/sh -c true
/bin/sh -c true
cc -c -xO3
Henri,
Thanks again for another prompt and extremely helpful response.
Henri Asseily wrote:
I humbly repeat my earlier suggestion to use DBIx::HA.
I'm going to try it again today, using the same benchmark system. I'll
report back the results.
I started looking at DBD::Multi again because it
Hi,
If you choose to use the sun compilers to compile DBI, you must
install the sun compilers. Sun does not come with the compilers
preinstalled. That's why you are getting /usr/ucb/cc: language
optional software package not installed. Have your sys-admin install the
Forte CC compilers
I expanded by benchmark of DBD::Multi to also include DBIx::HA for
comparison.
While the benchmark reported nearly a 200% overhead for DBD::Multi,
the overhead of DBIx::HA was much better, reported at 50%.
That sounds like a lot in both cases, but is not necessarily. First, my
test case is not
