> > > I'm guessing that DBI is making incorrect assumptions about SQL Types
> > > somewhere... Is this
> > > what's happening?
> >
> >
> > It could be differences between versions, as you apparently upgraded the
> > client only.
> >
> > You didn't mention the database version.
> >
> > Try runni
I found some discussion with the above subject from around February 2007
and thought I'd add my experience, since I just had to compile
DBD::Oracle on one of our Solaris systems.
I found that to get the compile to properly point at the 32-bit
libraries, I had to make the following changes to
John Scoles wrote:
Itanium could be a 32/64 bit problem did you compiled all your code
useing 32 bit libs?
I believe so...I know the c code is.
Perl:
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 2) configuration:
Platform:
osname=linux, osvers=2.6.9-55.el, archname=ia64-lin
Itanium could be a 32/64 bit problem
did you compiled all your code useing 32 bit libs?
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 8:03 AM
Subject: [DBD::Oracle] Familiar error to someone?
We have a mixed C/Perl/XS application that
We have a mixed C/Perl/XS application that we are moving to the Itanium.
After we compile everything and start it up after every SELECT statment
we are getting:
***glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size(fast): given> ***
Aborted
We are using:
HP rx2620 with Itanium processors
Perl 5.6.
Sven Miller wrote:
> And unfortunately I don't know enough about MySQL to be more helpful.
> Database links may be an Oracle-only thing.
>
> On 7/19/07, Theron Stanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This sounds like a good idea. I guess I just don't know enough about
>> databases yet to know how
