Stephen Clouse wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > OK, probably a stupid question: Why do you want to have comments inside
> > the SQL statements? It looks useless to me. Most databases even choke on
> > the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Simon Oliver wrote:
> > FYI, the DBI is working towards having all drivers (optionally) share
> > the same (parameterized) SQL pre-parser. The preparser will support
> > many whizzo features like rewriting comments from one style to another
> > if the orig
> FYI, the DBI is working towards having all drivers (optionally) share
> the same (parameterized) SQL pre-parser. The preparser will support
> many whizzo features like rewriting comments from one style to another
> if the original style is not supported by the database engine being used.
> More
Stephen Clouse writes:
> Pretty much every SQL server I've found groks the /* */ construct as a comment.
> MySQL, Oracle, and PG handle it fine. I don't use Sybase but I know it supports
> it as well, and by extension MSSQL probably does also. But I highly doubt any
> of them support pla
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 08:05:41AM -0700, Michael Peppler wrote:
> Ronald J Kimball writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:07:03 +0200, Morten Hanshaugen wrote:
> > >
> > > >It would be nice if '?'-characters inside comments could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> OK, probably a stupid question: Why do you want to have comments inside
> the SQL statements? It looks useless to me. Most databases even choke on
> the innocent semicolon at the end of th
On 2001-09-12 09:11:02 -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > OK, probably a stupid question: Why do you want to have comments inside
> > the SQL statements?
>
> For the same reason you would use comments anywhere; to document the code,
>
Ronald J Kimball writes:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:07:03 +0200, Morten Hanshaugen wrote:
> >
> > >It would be nice if '?'-characters inside comments could escape being
> > >counted when calculating and/or expanding the number of
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:23:59AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:07:03 +0200, Morten Hanshaugen wrote:
>
> >It would be nice if '?'-characters inside comments could escape being
> >counted when calculating and/or expanding the number of needed
> >arguments.
>
> OK, probably
At 11:07 PM 9/11/01 +0200, Morten Hanshaugen wrote:
>It would be nice if '?'-characters inside comments could escape being
>counted when calculating and/or expanding the number of needed
>arguments.
>Example code:
>$dbh->prepare("/*root there?*/ select user from user where user = ?");
It is not
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:07:03 +0200, Morten Hanshaugen wrote:
>I just want to let you
>know that question signs ('?') inside /* ... */ comments in a
>SQL-statement gives the following error message:
>
>DBD::mysql::st execute failed: called with 1 bind variables when 2 are needed at -e
>line 1.
>
Sorry to interrupt on you on such a tragic day. I just want to let you
know that question signs ('?') inside /* ... */ comments in a
SQL-statement gives the following error message:
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: called with 1 bind variables when 2 are needed at -e
line 1.
It would be nice if '
12 matches
Mail list logo
