Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-12 Thread John Scoles
Link McGaughey wrote: The design is stable until the business model changes. Which is the case with R&D projects as they are constantly changing. The applications we are writing are things that do not exist in any capacity in the market. Which makes "stable" a relative term when comparing it

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-12 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > I was really just looking for any future planning done on the DBI side > of things to aid with getting back full information. Either a flag to > pass into the func

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-12 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:21:53PM -0400, Link McGaughey wrote: > > [...] I too am using the > fetchrow_hashref, however it drops the table prefix on the return > column names, which in turn clobbers column names that are the same > across tables. Thus the reason for this thread. > > I was reall

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-12 Thread Link McGaughey
The design is stable until the business model changes. Which is the case with R&D projects as they are constantly changing. The applications we are writing are things that do not exist in any capacity in the market. Which makes "stable" a relative term when comparing it to a banking or warehousi

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-10 Thread Jared Still
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:23 -0400, Link McGaughey wrote: > ...aliasing each of the column names, but this becomes a maintenance > issue when you have alter the selected columns every time there is a > change to the table. Personally, I would work on stabilizing the design. Tables frequently be

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-06 Thread Link McGaughey
ent et n'aura > pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > > > >> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:26:07 -040

RE: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-06 Thread Martin Gainty
té pour le contenu fourni. > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:26:07 -0400 > From: sco...@pythian.com > To: tim.bu...@pobox.com > CC: dbi-users@perl.org; link.mcgaug...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status > > Not to speak for Tim on this but here is my 2cen

Re: (Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-06 Thread John Scoles
Not to speak for Tim on this but here is my 2cents worth, Your case here is poor SQL and or table design which you are trying to account for with DBI. If you intend to use the cursor/recordset column 'headers' as unique identifiers then you should set them up as such. ie Select test.id as u

(Fwd) Question regarding DBI status

2009-08-06 Thread Tim Bunce
- Forwarded message from Link McGaughey - Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:41:56 -0400 Subject: Question regarding DBI status From: Link McGaughey To: tim.bu...@pobox.com Tim, I found your information from CPAN, and had a question regarding the status of active development for DBI more specifi