Jeff Zucker wrote:
> Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have successfully been using DBD::CSV for the last year and recently upgraded
>> to Red Hat 7.0 from 6.2. The problem is that ever since the upgrade, the ORDER
>> BY clause on an ISO date field (i.e -mm-dd,m e.g. 2001-09-10) no
Hi
I have successfully been using DBD::CSV for the last year and recently upgraded
to Red Hat 7.0 from 6.2. The problem is that ever since the upgrade, the ORDER
BY clause on an ISO date field (i.e -mm-dd,m e.g. 2001-09-10) no longer
works. The sort comparison stops on the year (i.e. The
Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have successfully been using DBD::CSV for the last year and recently upgraded
> to Red Hat 7.0 from 6.2. The problem is that ever since the upgrade, the ORDER
> BY clause on an ISO date field (i.e -mm-dd,m e.g. 2001-09-10) no longer
> works. The sort c
Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have successfully been using DBD::CSV for the last year and recently
> upgraded
> to Red Hat 7.0 from 6.2. The problem is that ever since the upgrade,
> the ORDER
> BY clause on an ISO date field (i.e -mm-dd,m e.g. 2001-09-10) no longer
> works. The so
Hi
I have successfully been using DBD::CSV for the last year and recently upgraded
to Red Hat 7.0 from 6.2. The problem is that ever since the upgrade, the ORDER
BY clause on an ISO date field (i.e -mm-dd,m e.g. 2001-09-10) no longer
works. The sort comparison stops on the year (i.e. The sa
