On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:12:41PM -0800, Douglas Wilson wrote:
> From: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > What's an example where having finish() after the loop actually makes
> > > a difference? I'm trying to understand why is it a "mistake", as
> > > opposed to simply being superfluous?
From: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What's an example where having finish() after the loop actually makes
> > a difference? I'm trying to understand why is it a "mistake", as
> > opposed to simply being superfluous?
>
> Consider doing a select returning many rows some of which are either
[moved from dbi-dev to dbi-users]
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:56:25AM -0600, Paul DuBois wrote:
>
> >! When all the data has been fetched from a C statement, the
> >! driver should automatically call C for you. So you should
> >! I normally need to call it explicitly I when you know
> >! that you'
