On Monday, January 7, 2002, at 08:17 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Umm, these days you'd use $dbh->begin_work, right?
>
>
that's funny. that method is not in my docs on my home machine,
but it certainly is on the docs at CPAN... i had not seen it
before.
the extra things that the transaction method
On Monday, January 7, 2002, at 08:17 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Umm, these days you'd use $dbh->begin_work, right?
>
>
that's funny. that method is not in my docs on my home machine,
but it certainly is on the docs at CPAN... i had not seen it
before.
the only thing that the transaction methods
On Monday, January 7, 2002, at 08:17 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Umm, these days you'd use $dbh->begin_work, right?
>
>>
I didn't see this in my version of DBI, which I thought was 1.20
but indeed it is documented in the docs on CPAN.
The documented behavior is the same as the methods in DBIx.pm
Umm, these days you'd use $dbh->begin_work, right?
Tim.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:36:45AM -0500, Terrence Brannon wrote:
> Matt Seargent had an excellent way to open and close transactions
> in the Example::DB::Default class
> of the AnyDBD distribution. It saves you from the manual
> attribu
Matt Seargent had an excellent way to open and close transactions
in the Example::DB::Default class
of the AnyDBD distribution. It saves you from the manual
attribute-toggling tedium, you are engaging in below.
Since he was too humble/busy to make this a general CPAN module,
I have done so. It
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 01:20:18PM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:44:11 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> >> Will it leak if $dbh is a lexical, or in general?
> >
> >It's applying local to an element of a tied hash (or array, probably) that leaks.
> >
> >Google is your friend:
> >
>
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:44:11 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> Will it leak if $dbh is a lexical, or in general?
>
>It's applying local to an element of a tied hash (or array, probably) that leaks.
>
>Google is your friend:
>
>http://www.google.com/search?q=leak+tie+local+perl
So, is a DBI database
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:05:38AM -0800, Rob Bloodgood wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:10:32PM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:45:08 -0500, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > > $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
> > >
> > > Just a sidenote: you can use "local" here (even if $dbh
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:10:32PM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:45:08 -0500, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
> >
> > Just a sidenote: you can use "local" here (even if $dbh is a lexical).
> >
> > local $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
> >
> > This will
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:10:32PM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:45:08 -0500, Hardy Merrill wrote:
>
> > $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
>
> Just a sidenote: you can use "local" here (even if $dbh is a lexical).
>
> local $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
>
> This will restore the ol
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:45:08 -0500, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
Just a sidenote: you can use "local" here (even if $dbh is a lexical).
local $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
This will restore the old value of this property when the current block
is exited.
--
Bart.
> From: Hardy Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> $dbh->{RaiseError} = 1;
You might want to turn PrintError off when RaiseError is on...
> But it seems like it won't work - an eval in an eval - can
> someone just confirm for me that this won't work?
An eval within an eval is fine. It's the b
12 matches
Mail list logo
