if I don't over think it.
From: "John Adams"
To: "peter"
Cc: "Kurt Jaeger" , "Rob Dixon" ,
"Tim Bunce"
Sent: Thursday, 8 September, 2016 18:18:53
Subject: Re: DBD for SQL Server
I've never loved unixODBC. I'd go a long way
Microsoft ODBC Driver for SQL Server on Linux.
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Kurt Jaeger"
> *To: *"Rob Dixon"
> *Cc: *"Tim Bunce"
> *Sent: *Wednesday, 7 September, 2016 10:01:40
> *Subject: *Re: DBD for SQL Server
>
>
DBD::ODBC
On Linux you can use FreeTDS & unixODBC , or Microsoft also has Microsoft ODBC
Driver for SQL Server on Linux.
From: "Kurt Jaeger"
To: "Rob Dixon"
Cc: "Tim Bunce"
Sent: Wednesday, 7 September, 2016 10:01:40
Subject: Re: DBD for SQL Server
We connect to SQL Server from Linux at work using DBD::ODBC and the FreeTDS
driver. I think that combination gives you the greatest amount of support.
Keith Carangelo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I'm wondering why there is no DBD module for Microsoft SQL Serve
On 06/09/16 14:40, Rob Dixon wrote:
Hey Tim
I'm wondering why there is no DBD module for Microsoft SQL Server?
Is it a technical impossibility, or is it just waiting to be written?
Thank you,
Rob Dixon
Norfolk
England
Microsoft has aligned itself with ODBC in the past and has reaffirmed th
Hi!
> I'm wondering why there is no DBD module for Microsoft SQL Server?
MS SQL is mostly-compatible with DBD::Sybase, as far as I know.
http://search.cpan.org/~mewp/DBD-Sybase-1.15/Sybase.pm#Using_DBD::Sybase_with_MS-SQL
> Is it a technical impossibility, or is it just waiting to be written?
