Ah, great. Thanks Matt.
[Note to self: It's worth checking the bug tracker for updates from users.]
DBI 1.621 is on it's way.
Tim.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:23:44AM -0500, Matthew Musgrove wrote:
> Tim,
> Yes, I updated that bug report last week to report that the patch worked
> for me.
>
> T
Tim,
Yes, I updated that bug report last week to report that the patch worked
for me.
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Tim wrote:
> Hello Matthew.
>
> It's worth checking the bug tracker for known problems.
> Your problem sounds like
> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id
Hello Matthew.
It's worth checking the bug tracker for known problems.
Your problem sounds like https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=77137
for which we have a patch attached to the ticket.
I'm about to make a trial release of 1.621 with that patch included.
I'd be grateful if you could
I've retested with DBI 1.617 and DBI 1.618. Our program does not segfault
with either of them so it has to be something specific to the 1.620 changes.
Matt
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Matthew Musgrove wrote:
> We have this threaded program that runs as a daemonized service and it's
> been
Here's the backtrace log.
Matt
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Matthew Musgrove wrote:
> We have this threaded program that runs as a daemonized service and it's
> been happy for quite a while using DBI 1.616 and DBD::Oracle 1.30. Last
> week, I updated DBI to 1.620 and DBD::Oracle 1.44 and w
We have this threaded program that runs as a daemonized service and it's
been happy for quite a while using DBI 1.616 and DBD::Oracle 1.30. Last
week, I updated DBI to 1.620 and DBD::Oracle 1.44 and when I restarted the
service, it segfaulted as soon as it created a new thread. I was pretty
sure th
