On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:31:07PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
On 6/22/07, Peter Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:31:25PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a less pragma
so you'd be able to say something like
use less qw(memory);
to indicate that cpu/memory
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a less pragma
so you'd be able to say something like
use less qw(memory);
to indicate that cpu/memory balance should be shifted towards cpu.
Pity that never happened.
It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Monday 25 June 2007 23:31:25 Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a less pragma
so you'd be able to say something like
use less
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like my
$x = 1 if $y;. I don't remember what the conclusion
On 6/22/07, Peter Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like my
$x
From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 June 2007 13:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dbi-users@perl.org
Subject: Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)-sv_flags 0x0001) failed
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the attached patch I now have all tests successful.
I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like my
$x = 1 if $y;. I don't remember what the
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
Not sure when I'll be able to dig deeper. CC'd to perl5-porters in the
hope they can help narrow it down.
With the attached patch I now have all tests successful.
Applied. Thanks Steve!
Tim.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:44:22 Steve Hay wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz
size: 490304 bytes
md5:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:59:31 Steve Hay wrote:
Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Yes. But you patch just removes the my
No it doesn't. Look again.
Just ignore me *goes and grabs coffee*
...
Tels
- --
Signed on Thu
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the attached patch I now have all tests successful.
I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like my
$x = 1 if $y;. I don't remember what the conclusion of it all was,
except that it's probably best avoided. Is that
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz
size: 490304 bytes
md5: fca667f59dff24058a8e0e8f09e2aad9
=head2 Changes in DBI 1.57 (svn rev 9639), 13th June 2007
Fixed t/86gofer_fail tests to be less
13 matches
Mail list logo
