Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-25 Thread Scott R. Godin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott R. Godin) wrote: > > Well post the script and we can look. Please eliminate the parts that are > > not relevant if you script is big. > > it's about 255 lines of code incuding comments.. I'll remove the > comments from the file to short

RE: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-25 Thread Sterin, Ilya
> -Original Message- > From: Hirosi Taguti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete) > > > > Comparison of languages: > >

Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-25 Thread Hirosi Taguti
> Comparison of languages: > > Description C C++ Perl Python Tcl Shell PHP Lisp Forth Can anyone add "java"? (I can't) -- Hirosi Taguti [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-25 Thread Jim Smith
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:56:19PM -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > > Well I'm not a web developer, never used mod_perl, there is > the article on Perl.com describing how they built e-toys with > mod_perl. I think at the time it was the 3rd busiest web site > at the time. I don't know if the

Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Scott R. Godin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ilya Sterin) wrote: > Well post the script and we can look. Please eliminate the parts that are > not relevant if you script is big. it's about 255 lines of code incuding comments.. I'll remove the comments from the file to shorten it a bit.

Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Scott R. Godin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Clouse) wrote: > Having said all that, is this really on topic for dbi-users? indeed it is, since the script in question is banking heavily upon DBI and DBD::mysql to do the work. -- Scott R. Godin| e-mail : [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Scott R. Godin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/24/01 3:25 PM Subject: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete) here's a missive fired off by the site admin after he "benchmarked" two scripts, one written in php and

RE: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Scott T. Hildreth
Well I'm not a web developer, never used mod_perl, there is the article on Perl.com describing how they built e-toys with mod_perl. I think at the time it was the 3rd busiest web site at the time. I don't know if the hardware even compares, but you can take a look, if you haven't already.

Re: php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Stephen Clouse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote: > Document Path: /testbed/news2.php?executesearch=1 > Document Length:769 bytes [snip] > Document Path: /cgi-bin/simplesearch.cgi?searchfor=c > Document Length:

php vs perl again (reposted - original post was incomplete)

2001-10-24 Thread Scott R. Godin
here's a missive fired off by the site admin after he "benchmarked" two scripts, one written in php and one written in perl/cgi > > First of all. > > Dude. you're out of your mind. Im serious. > > The WHOLE point about why PHP is faster than Perl is because the > interpreter is compiled int

php vs perl again

2001-10-24 Thread Scott R. Godin
here's a missive fired off by the site admin after he "benchmarked" two scripts, one written in php and one written in perl/cgi > > First of all. > > Dude. you're out of your mind. Im serious. > > The WHOLE point about why PHP is faster than Perl is because the > interpreter is compiled int