Brandon Metcalf wrote:
j == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
j> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
j> >Hm. The documentation says it's experimental, but the version I have
j> >seems to be broken altogether. There is no new() method in the
j> >DBI::Format package in the code and I get in the following error:
j> >
j>
j == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
j> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
j> >Hm. The documentation says it's experimental, but the version I have
j> >seems to be broken altogether. There is no new() method in the
j> >DBI::Format package in the code and I get in the following error:
j> >
j> You don't decl
Brandon Metcalf wrote:
Hm. The documentation says it's experimental, but the version I have
seems to be broken altogether. There is no new() method in the
DBI::Format package in the code and I get in the following error:
You don't declare a new DBI::Format object, you create a new
DBI::Format::F
j == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
j> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
j> >Does DBI have a print method similar to the print in the old Pg.pm
j> >interface? With the old print method I could print out query results
j> >as they would appear if I ran the query directly with the column names
j> >and column
Brandon Metcalf wrote:
Does DBI have a print method similar to the print in the old Pg.pm
interface? With the old print method I could print out query results
as they would appear if I ran the query directly with the column names
and column widths according to value widths, etc.
Do I have to roll
Does DBI have a print method similar to the print in the old Pg.pm
interface? With the old print method I could print out query results
as they would appear if I ran the query directly with the column names
and column widths according to value widths, etc.
Do I have to roll my own under DBI using
