Re: Seeking *non* thread-friendly DBD

2005-08-11 Thread Dean Arnold
Matt Sergeant wrote: On 22 Jul 2005, at 12:30, Dean Arnold wrote: Hoping someone can point me at a DBD thats known to be non-thread-friendly (ie, hasn't implemented the clone() methods). However, its underlying client libs and XS subs (if any) do need to be thread-capable (ie, no writing to

Re: Seeking *non* thread-friendly DBD

2005-08-11 Thread Dean Arnold
Tim Bunce wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:01:08AM -0700, Dean Arnold wrote: I'm running into an issue while trying to test w/ DBIx::Threaded; there seems to be some interdependency between selectrow_arrayref and selectall_arrayref using the prepared stmt form. (I'm on WinXP, AS 5.8.3, DBI

Re: Seeking *non* thread-friendly DBD

2005-08-11 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Dean Arnold wrote: Tim Bunce wrote: Try tracing. I'd guess there's a bug related to calling execute() after finish(). Added a trace(7); here's the output (with logon stuff trimmed): - selectall_arrayref for DBD::SQLite::db

Re: Seeking *non* thread-friendly DBD

2005-08-11 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:01:08AM -0700, Dean Arnold wrote: I'm running into an issue while trying to test w/ DBIx::Threaded; there seems to be some interdependency between selectrow_arrayref and selectall_arrayref using the prepared stmt form. (I'm on WinXP, AS 5.8.3, DBI 1.48,

Re: Seeking *non* thread-friendly DBD

2005-07-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 22 Jul 2005, at 12:30, Dean Arnold wrote: Hoping someone can point me at a DBD thats known to be non-thread-friendly (ie, hasn't implemented the clone() methods). However, its underlying client libs and XS subs (if any) do need to be thread-capable (ie, no writing to process-global variables