On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:54:44AM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> I would like to include your critisizm of the support for many to many
>> in RecursiveUpdate in it's documentation. Tell me if I get it ri
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:54:44AM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I would like to include your critisizm of the support for many to many
> in RecursiveUpdate in it's documentation. Tell me if I get it right.
> What I remember is two points:
>
> 1. That I rely on the fact that
>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:46:19PM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> I've assembled a package out of the code in my last year's Advent
> article: http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2007/16
Hmm. I'm not sure anything that's called AdvancedWebSearch makes any
sense at all as a resultset compo
Hi Matt,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:35:03PM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
>> Unlike the original update_or_create - recursive_update works for
>> tables with auto_increment primary keys
>
> Please stop referring to "doesn
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:41:50PM -0400, Jason Kohles wrote:
> > If you are one of the people who is getting tired of me popping up on
> > IRC every couple of weeks to try once again to track down (or at least
> > positively ident
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:20:04PM -0500, Lanny Ripple wrote:
> I've come across a bug in the cookbook code for 'Arbitrary SQL
> through a custom ResultSource'. If you name resultsets by full
> class name and have defined a complex query using the suggested code
> you will find the class_mapping i
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:41:50PM -0400, Jason Kohles wrote:
> If you are one of the people who is getting tired of me popping up on
> IRC every couple of weeks to try once again to track down (or at least
> positively identify) this problem, you are in luck! I've finally
> isolated exactly
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:43:47PM +0200, Felix Antonius Wilhelm Ostmann wrote:
> I spend some time and find out, that the Parser and Parser::DBI dont
> support ENUM, but the Producer can make them, so Parser MySQL and
> Producer PostgreSQL works, but Parser PostgreSQL and Producer PostgreSQL
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:35:03PM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> Unlike the original update_or_create - recursive_update works for
> tables with auto_increment primary keys
Please stop referring to "doesn't accept undef for auto-inc like MySQL does"
as broken.
--
Matt S Trout Nee
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:46:01AM -0400, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> I'm working on a Catalyst project that uses DBIx::Class (0.08010) as the
> ORM, and the StackTrace plugin. This combination is causing a problem.
>
> In one section of this project I'm using a ResultSet to create a new row
> in a t
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:25:06PM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> For people not currently running custom Perl on their RHEL based
> distros:
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0876.html
>
> Looks like they've (finally) fixed the bless/overload issue.
Can somebody test this and figur
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Jens Gassmann wrote:
> hi,
>
> attach the patch and test for handling timezone and
> datetime_undef_if_invalid correctly.
>
> Please be indulge with me and the result - if there any missing or wrong
> with this first patch and test - please correct me.
Hi Matt,
I would like to include your critisizm of the support for many to many
in RecursiveUpdate in it's documentation. Tell me if I get it right.
What I remember is two points:
1. That I rely on the fact that
if($object->can($name) and
!$object->result_source->has_relationship($n
13 matches
Mail list logo
