+1 for the DBIC2 namespace and the split being original stable dbic on the
primary space.
I think this give's the most stability to the users, and at the same time
give the development team the most space for innovating into new and
exciting area's should they wish to. Seems like a win-win to me!
On 2016-10-23 3:04 PM, Karen Etheridge wrote:
> I also like the idea of default dbic being the stable one, and the dbic2
being opt in. +1
I don't see how it could credibly be the other way. There is no way to get
informed consent from all the existing DBIx::Class users to ensure that they
under
On 2016-10-23 1:55 PM, Christian Walde wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:19:42 +0200, Andrew Beverley wrote:
- Riba was prepared to keep maintaining (and "tightening" in slower
time) "DBIC"
As far as i understood there was no circumstance under which he'd have been
involved further, at all. His
> I also like the idea of default dbic being the stable one, and the dbic2
being opt in. +1
I don't see how it could credibly be the other way. There is no way to get
informed consent from all the existing DBIx::Class users to ensure that
they understand they are getting bleeding-edge code. Moving
I also like the idea of default dbic being the stable one, and the dbic2
being opt in. +1
--
sent from a rotary phone, pardon my brevity
On Oct 23, 2016 1:21 PM, "Andrew Beverley" wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:04 -0400 David Golden wrote:
> [...]
> > * DBIx::Class (DBIC) – Peter's work pr
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:19:42 +0200, Andrew Beverley
wrote:
- Riba was prepared to keep maintaining (and "tightening" in slower
time) "DBIC"
As far as i understood there was no circumstance under which he'd have
been involved further, at all. His plan, as far as i saw it stated, was to
r
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Ashley Pond V wrote:
> I am of a similar mind. I want to have both code paths and this seems
> like the only way to do that.
I worry a lot about the costs to the ecosystem of split effort.
There's a lot of DBIx::Class::* out there,
On the other hand usin
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:04 -0400 David Golden wrote:
> [...]
>> * DBIx::Class (DBIC) – Peter's work provides a capstone, with only bug
>> fixes thereafter
>> * DBIx::Class2 (DBIC2) – new feature development, with lower stability
>> expect
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:04 -0400 David Golden wrote:
[...]
> * DBIx::Class (DBIC) – Peter's work provides a capstone, with only bug
> fixes thereafter
> * DBIx::Class2 (DBIC2) – new feature development, with lower stability
> expectations
>
> Some of the benefits I could see from this:
>
> (1)
