On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
I want to:
1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
2. Only include jobs that satisfy some criterion, without excluding
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where I
want to:
1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
2. Only include jobs that satisfy some criterion, without excluding
projects where no such jobs exist (i.e. add a condition to
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
I want to:
1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
2. Only include
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
I want to:
1. Sort the jobs of
On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
Shea --
There may be a legacy code situation or some political barriers, but
Peter's point is that you can modify both individual Result:: classes and
ResultSet:: classes to make your scripts much more powerful and flexible.
They're designed to work this way, which is why each Result class
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 09:37 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr
From: Peter Rabbitson rabbit+d...@rabbit.us
what is so scary/undesirable about modifying the schema ?
That is a real question - you are not the first to word things thusly. I
need to figure out where the fear to add an extra definition is coming
from.
Cheers
I can tell you my source
