Hi,
I posted this to the list in May, just looking for confirmation that the
API I had in mind was correct, before implementing it.
(Since my first, implemented suggestion had been shot down, and I'd
rather nail the spec down before coding it again.)
No response at the time, but I thought I'd
On 07/05/10 06:31, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 01:08:52PM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 22/04/10 19:00, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hey all,
Wouldn't it be nice if the ResultSet iterators were a bit more advanced?
I would love it if the iterator built
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 01:08:52PM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 22/04/10 19:00, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hey all,
Wouldn't it be nice if the ResultSet iterators were a bit more advanced?
I would love it if the iterator built into DBIx::Class supported some
more
On 22/04/10 19:00, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hey all,
Wouldn't it be nice if the ResultSet iterators were a bit more advanced?
I would love it if the iterator built into DBIx::Class supported some
more functional programming style methods.
ie. So that I could do:
Hey all,
Wouldn't it be nice if the ResultSet iterators were a bit more advanced?
I would love it if the iterator built into DBIx::Class supported some
more functional programming style methods.
ie. So that I could do:
$schema-resultset('Users')-search(
{ first_name = 'Bob' }
)-foreach(
Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hey all,
Wouldn't it be nice if the ResultSet iterators were a bit more advanced?
I would love it if the iterator built into DBIx::Class supported some
more functional programming style methods.
ie. So that I could do:
$schema-resultset('Users')-search(
{
On 4/22/2010 5:00 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
The implicit iterators built into DBIC resultsets were a blatant design
mistake
Can you expand on this statement? I'm curious to hear more.
___
List:
